Policy & Global Updates

Signals of change
from around the world.

Our editorial lens on the policies, regulatory decisions and evidence shaping children’s digital lives—and why they matter for an Internet designed around childhood.

Featured analysisPublished perspective
Policy & digital wellbeingSingapore

Singapore is considering mandatory safeguards for teenage social-media users, including daily time limits and safer defaults for features such as infinite scroll, autoplay, unsolicited contact and algorithmic feeds. The measures would be supported by age checks and legislative changes expected in 2027.

Read the full analysis

Latest perspectives

Two more developments to watch.

New Zealand

Policy & legislation

New Zealand proposes a wider duty of care for children online

A proposed Online Safety Bill would restrict high-risk social-media platforms for under-16s, require services used by children to assess and reduce risks, bring AI companion platforms into scope, and establish an independent regulator.

Read our analysis
European Union

Regulation & enforcement

EU scrutiny turns to safer defaults for young people’s accounts

The European Commission has issued preliminary findings that TikTok’s account settings for minors do not meet Digital Services Act safety standards, focusing on public visibility and the recommendation of young people’s content.

Read our analysis

Browse the archive

Find an update

Search by subject or place, or narrow the list by policy topic. Published analysis will accumulate here over time.

4 updates

Policy & digital wellbeingSingapore

Singapore considers mandatory safeguards for teenage social-media users

Singapore is considering mandatory safeguards for teenage social-media users, including daily time limits and safer defaults for features such as infinite scroll, autoplay, unsolicited contact and algorithmic feeds. The measures would be supported by age checks and legislative changes expected in 2027.

Read analysis

Our editorial approach

Constructive scrutiny—not automatic endorsement.

We recognise what a policy could improve, then ask whether it changes the underlying digital environment or primarily restricts children’s access to one part of it.

Our analysis distinguishes proposals from enacted measures and preliminary findings from final decisions. Selection does not imply endorsement, and conclusions should evolve as implementation evidence emerges.